Bibliography

1

S. T. Doherty and K. W. Axhausen.
The developement of a unified modelling framework for the household activity-travel scheduling process.
In Verkehr und Mobilität, number 66 in Stadt Region Land. Institut für Stadtbauwesen, Technical University, Aachen, Germany, 1998.

2

K. Nagel.
Distributed intelligence in large scale traffic simulations on parallel computers, submitted.
See sim.inf.ethz.ch/papers.

3

P. Waddell, A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson.
Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: Design and implementation of UrbanSim.
Networks and Spatial Economics, 2003.
In press.

4

S. Wolfram.
Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata.
World Scientific, Singapore, 1986.

5

T. Kohonen.
Self-organizing maps.
Springer Series in Information Sciences, 30. Springer, 2000.

6

J.D. Holland.
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems.
Bradford Books, 1992.
Reprint edition.

7

M. Dorigo, G. DiCaro, and L.M. Gambardella.
Ant algorithms for discrete optimization.
Artificial Life, 5(2):-172, 1999.

8

R.G. Palmer, W. Brian Arthur, J. H. Holland, Blake LeBaron, and Paul Tayler.
Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stockmarket.
Physica D, 75:-274, 1994.

9

J. Ferber.
Multi-agent systems. An Introduction to distributed artificial intelligence.
Addison-Wesley, 1999.

10

G. Weiss, editor.
Multiagent Systems. A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence.
The MIT Press, 1999.

11

SWARM.
www.swarm.org.

12

RePast.
Recursive porous agent simulation toolkit.
repast.sourcefourge.net.

13

D. Lohse.
Verkehrsplanung, volume 2 of Grundlagen der Straßenverkehrstechnik und der Verkehrsplanung.
Verlag für Bauwesen, Berlin, 1997.

14

Y. Sheffi.
Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods.
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985.

15

In D. Hensher and J. King, editors, The Leading Edge of Travel Behavior Research. Pergamon, 2001.

16

M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman.
Discrete choice analysis.
The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

17

J. L. Bowman.
The day activity schedule approach to travel demand analysis.
PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

18

S. Ramming.
Network Knowledge and Route Choice.
PhD thesis, MIT, MA, USA, 2002.
See web.mit.edu/sramming/www/Thesis/ramming.defense.draft.pdf.

19

H. A. Rakha and M. W. Van Aerde.
Comparison of simulation modules of TRANSYT and INTEGRATION models.
Transportation Research Record, 1566:-7, 1996.

20

DYNAMIT.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. See its.mit.edu. Also see dynamictrafficassignment.org.

21

DYNASMART.
See www.dynasmart.com. Also see dynamictrafficassignment.org.

22

TRANSIMS.
TRansportation ANalysis and SIMulation System, since 1992.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM. See transims.tsasa.lanl.gov.

23

C. Gawron.
Simulation-based traffic assignment.
PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Germany, 1998a.

24

G. D. B. Cameron and C. I. D. Duncan.
PARAMICS -- Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic.
J. Supercomputing, 10(1):, 1996.

25

K. Nagel and M. Rickert.
Parallel implementation of the TRANSIMS micro-simulation.
Parallel Computing, 27(12):-1639, 2001.

26

N. Cetin and K. Nagel.
Parallel queue model approach to traffic microsimulations.
Paper 03-4272, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Also see sim.inf.ethz.ch/papers.

27

Gürling T. and Young W.
Perspectives on travel behavior: Decision paradigms.
Travel Behaviour Research, The Leading Edge, pages 219-225, 2001.

28

R. Selten and M. Schreckenberg.
Experimental investigation of day-to-day route choice behavior.
See sim.inf.ethz.ch/papers.

29

D. Helbing, M. Schonhof, and D. Kern.
Volatile decision dynamics: experiments, stochastic description, intermittency control and traffic optimization.
New Journal of Physics, 4(33), 2002.

30

David E. Kaufman, Karl E. Wunderlich, and Robert L. Smith.
An iterative routing/assignment method for anticipatory real-time route guidance.
Technical Report IVHS Technical Report 91-02, University of Michigan Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, Ann Arbor MI 48109, May 1991.

31

M. Friedrich, I. Hofsäß, K. Nökel, and P. Vortisch.
A dynamic traffic assignment method for planning and telematic applications.
In Proceedings of Seminar K, European Transport Conference, Cambridge, GB, 2000.

32

A. de Palma and F. Marchal.
Real case applications of the fully dynamic METROPOLIS tool-box: an advocacy for large-scale mesoscopic transportation systems.
Networks and Spatial Economics, 2002.

33

R. Cayford, W.-H. Lin, and C.F. Daganzo.
The NETCELL simulation package: Technical description.
California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-97-23, University of California, Berkeley, 1997.

34

T. Schwerdtfeger.
Makroskopisches Simulationsmodell für Schnellstraßennetze mit Berücksichtigung von Einzelfahrzeugen (DYNEMO).
PhD thesis, University of Karsruhe, Germany, 1987.

35

Q. Yang.
A Simulation Laboratory for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems.
PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997.
See also its.mit.edu.

36

VISSIM.
Planung Transport und Verkehr (PTV) GmbH. See www.ptv.de.

37

T. L. Friesz, D. Bernstein, N. J. Mehta, R. L. Tobin, and S. Ganjalizadeh.
Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibria and idealized traveler information systems.
Operations Research, 42(6):-1136, 1994.

38

J.A. Bottom.
Consistent anticipatory route guidance.
PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

39

E. Cascetta and C. Cantarella.
A day-to-day and within day dynamic stochastic assignment model.
Transportation Research A, 25A(5):-291, 1991.

40

R. Palmer.
Broken ergodicity.
In D. L. Stein, editor, Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity, volume I of Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, pages 275-300. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

41

M. Rickert and K. Nagel.
Issues of simulation-based route assignment.
Presented at the International Symposium on Traffic and Transportation Theory (ISTTT) in Jerusalem, 1999.

42

S. Weinmann.
Simulation of spatial learning mechanisms.
PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, in preparation.

43

C. Gawron.
An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(3):-407, 1998b.

44

R. R. Jacob, M. V. Marathe, and K. Nagel.
A computational study of routing algorithms for realistic transportation networks.
ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithms, 4(1999es, Article No. 6), 1999.

45

B. Raney, N. Cetin, A. Völlmy, M. Vrtic, K. Axhausen, and K. Nagel.
An agent-based microsimulation model of Swiss travel: First results.
Paper 03-4267, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Also see sim.inf.ethz.ch/papers.

46

A. Voellmy, M. Vrtic, B. Raney, K. Axhausen, and K. Nagel.
Status of a TRANSIMS implementation for Switzerland.
Networks and Spatial Economics, forthcoming. See www.inf.ethz.ch/~nagel/papers.

47

I.R. Porche.
Dynamic traffic control: Decentralized and coordinated methods.
PhD thesis, University of Michigan, 1998.

48

K. Nagel.
Individual adaption in a path-based simulation of the freeway network of Northrhine-Westfalia.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 7(6):, 1996.