next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: Route learning in iterated Previous: Summary

Bibliography

1
Y. Sheffi.
Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods.
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985.

2
C.F. Daganzo.
Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice.
Transportation Science, 32(1):3-11, 1998.

3
J.A. Bottom.
Consistent anticipatory route guidance.
PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

4
E. Cascetta and C. Cantarella.
A day-to-day and within day dynamic stochastic assignment model.
Transportation Research A, 25A(5):277-291, 1991.

5
R. Palmer.
Broken ergodicity.
In D. L. Stein, editor, Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity, volume I of Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, pages 275-300. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

6
P. Waddell, A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson.
Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: D esign and implementation of UrbanSim.
Networks and Spatial Economics, in press.

7
N. Cetin and K. Nagel.
Parallel queue model approach to traffic microsimulations.
In Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Switzerland, March 2002.

8
C. Gawron.
An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(3):393-407, 1998.

9
M. Rickert and K. Nagel.
Experiences with a simplified microsimulation for the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 8(3):483-504, 1997.

10
R.J. Beckman et al.
TRANSIMS-Release 1.0 - The Dallas-Fort Worth case study.
Los Alamos Unclassified Report (LA-UR) 97-4502, Los Alamos National Laboratory, see transims.tsasa.lanl.gov, 1997.

11
J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund.
Evolutionary games and replicator dynamics.
Cambridge University Press, 1998.

12
T. Kelly and K. Nagel.
Relaxation criteria for iterated traffic simulations.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(1):113-132, 1998.

13
M. Rickert.
Traffic simulation on distributed memory computers.
PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Germany, 1998.
See www.zpr.uni-koeln.de/~mr/dissertation.

14
S. Weinmann.
Simulation of spatial learning mechanisms.
PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, in preparation.

15
J. H. Holland.
Using classifier systems to study adaptive nonlinear networks.

16
M. Ben-Akiva.
Route choice models.
Presented at the Workshop on ``Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks'', Bonn, December 2001.

17
K. Nagel and C.L. Barrett.
Using microsimulation feedback for trip adaptation for realistic traffic in Dallas.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 8(3):505-526, 1997.

18
K. Nagel.
High-speed microsimulations of traffic flow.
PhD thesis, University of Cologne, 1994/95.

19
B. Raney and K. Nagel.
Issues of feedback routing in iterated transportation simulations.
in preparation.

20
H. Unger.
An approach using neural networks for the control of the behaviour of autonomous individuals.
In A. Tentner, editor, High Performance Computing 1998, pages 98-103. The Society for Computer Simulation International, 1998.

21
H. Unger.
Modellierung des Verhaltens autonomer Verkehrsteilnehmer in einer variablen staedtischen Umgebung.
PhD thesis, TU Berlin, 2002.

22
Chr. Gloor.
Modelling of autonomous agents in a realistic road network (in german).
Diplomarbeit, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, 2001.

23
B. W. Bush.
Personal communication.

24
J. Esser.
Simulation von Stadtverkehr auf der Basis zellularer Automaten.
PhD thesis, University of Duisburg, Germany, 1998.

25
K.W. Axhausen.
A simultaneous simulation of activity chains.
In P.M. Jones, editor, New Approaches in Dynamic and Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis, pages 206-225. Avebury, Aldershot, 1990.

26
S. T. Doherty and K. W. Axhausen.
The developement of a unified modelling framework for the household activity-travel scheduling process.
In Verkehr und Mobilität, number 66 in Stadt Region Land. Institut für Stadtbauwesen, Technical University, Aachen, Germany, 1998.

27
T. Kelly.
Driver strategy and traffic system performance.
Physica A, 235:407, 1997.

28
K. Nagel and S. Rasmussen.
Traffic at the edge of chaos.
In R. A. Brooks and P. Maes, editors, Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, pages 222-235. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.


Kai Nagel 2002-05-20