next up previous
Next: Spatial competition Up: Spatial competition and price Previous: Introduction

Related work

The model is an open one related to the partial equilibrium models of much of micro-economics. In particular money and its acceptance in trade is taken as a primitive concept. There is a literature on the acceptance of money both in a static equilibrium context (see for example [2]) and in a "bootstrap" or dynamic context (see for example [3,4]). These are extremely simple closed models of the economy where each individual is both a buyer and seller. Eventually we would like to construct a reasonable model where the acceptance of money, the emergence of competitive price and the emergence of market structure all arise from the system dynamics. This will call for an appropriate combination of the features of the model presented here with the closed models noted above. We do not pursue this further here. Instead by taking the acceptance of money as given our observations are confined to the emergence of markets and the nature of price. The static economic theories of monopoly and mass homogeneous competitive equilibrium provide natural upper and lower benchmarks to gauge market behavior. The intermediate zone between $n=2$ and very many is covered in the economic literature by various oligopoly models, of which those of Cournot [5], Bertrand [6] and Chamberlin [7] serve as exemplars. The Chamberlin model unlike the earlier models stresses that all firms trade in differentiated goods. They are all in part differentiated or partially monopolistic. When one considers both information and physical location this is a considerable step towards greater realism. Other work on evolutionary or behavioral learning in price formation are Refs. [8,9,10].


next up previous
Next: Spatial competition Up: Spatial competition and price Previous: Introduction
Kai Nagel 2002-06-18