Bibliography

1

G. Weiss, editor.
Multiagent Systems. A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence.
The MIT Press, 1999.

2

Y. Sheffi.
Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods.
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985.

3

K. Nagel, P. Stretz, M. Pieck, S. Leckey, R. Donnelly, and C. L. Barrett.
TRANSIMS traffic flow characteristics.
Los Alamos Unclassified Report (LA-UR) 97-3530, Los Alamos National Laboratory, see transims.tsasa.lanl.gov, 1997.

4

C. Gawron.
An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(3):393-407, 1998.

5

P. M. Simon and K. Nagel.
Simple queueing model applied to the city of Portland.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 10(5):941-960, 1999.

6

R. R. Jacob, M. V. Marathe, and K. Nagel.
A computational study of routing algorithms for realistic transportation networks.
ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithms, 4(1999es, Article No. 6), 1999.

7

M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman.
Discrete choice analysis.
The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

8

J.A. Bottom.
Consistent anticipatory route guidance.
PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

9

C. Gawron.
An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model.
In International Journal of Modern Physics C [4], pages 393-407.

10

N. Cetin and K. Nagel, submitted.
See www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/nagel/papers.

11

E. Cascetta and C. Cantarella.
A day-to-day and within day dynamic stochastic assignment model.
Transportation Research A, 25A(5):277-291, 1991.

12

R. Palmer.
Broken ergodicity.
In D. L. Stein, editor, Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity, volume I of Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, pages 275-300. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

13

M. Rickert and K. Nagel.
Experiences with a simplified microsimulation for the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 8(3):483-504, 1997.

14

R.J. Beckman et al.
TRANSIMS-Release 1.0 - The Dallas-Fort Worth case study.
Los Alamos Unclassified Report (LA-UR) 97-4502, Los Alamos National Laboratory, see transims.tsasa.lanl.gov, 1997.

15

J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund.
Evolutionary games and replicator dynamics.
Cambridge University Press, 1998.

16

T. Kelly and K. Nagel.
Relaxation criteria for iterated traffic simulations.
International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(1):113-132, 1998.

17

H.S. Mahmassani and S. Peeta.
Network performance under system optimal and user equilibrium assignments: Implications for advanced traveler information systems.
Transportation Research Record, 1408:83-93, 1993.

18

M. Rickert.
Traffic simulation on distributed memory computers.
PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Germany, 1998.
See www.zpr.uni-koeln.de/~mr/dissertation.

19

J.D. Holland.
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems.
Bradford Books, 1992.
Reprint edition.

20

M. Ben-Akiva.
Route choice models.
Presented at the Workshop on ``Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks'', Bonn, December 2001.

21

B. Raney and K. Nagel.
Iterative route planning for modular transportation simulation.
In Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Switzerland, March 2002.
See www.strc.ch.

22

H. Unger.
An approach using neural networks for the control of the behaviour of autonomous individuals.
In A. Tentner, editor, High Performance Computing 1998, pages 98-103. The Society for Computer Simulation International, 1998.

23

H. Unger.
Modellierung des Verhaltens autonomer Verkehrsteilnehmer in einer variablen staedtischen Umgebung.
PhD thesis, TU Berlin, 2002.

24

Chr. Gloor.
Modelling of autonomous agents in a realistic road network (in German).
Diplomarbeit, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, 2001.

25

S. Weinmann.
Simulation of spatial learning mechanisms.
PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, in preparation.

26

I. Chabini.
Discrete dynamic shortest path problems in transportation applications: Complexity and algorithms with optimal run time.
Transportation Research Records, 1645:170-175, 1998.

27

B. W. Bush.
Personal communication.

28

J. Esser.
Simulation von Stadtverkehr auf der Basis zellularer Automaten.
PhD thesis, University of Duisburg, Germany, 1998.

29

K.W. Axhausen.
A simultaneous simulation of activity chains.
In P.M. Jones, editor, New Approaches in Dynamic and Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis, pages 206-225. Avebury, Aldershot, 1990.

30

S. T. Doherty and K. W. Axhausen.
The developement of a unified modelling framework for the household activity-travel scheduling process.
In Verkehr und Mobilität, number 66 in Stadt Region Land. Institut für Stadtbauwesen, Technical University, Aachen, Germany, 1998.

31

T. Kelly.
Driver strategy and traffic system performance.
Physica A, 235:407, 1997.

32

K. Nagel and S. Rasmussen.
Traffic at the edge of chaos.
In R. A. Brooks and P. Maes, editors, Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, pages 222-235. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

33

K. Nagel and M. Rickert.
Parallel implementation of the TRANSIMS micro-simulation.
Parallel Computing, 27(12):1611-1639, 2001.

34

P. Gonnet.
A thread-based distributed traffic micro-simulation.
Term project, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, 2001.

35

D.M. Beazley, P.S. Lomdahl, N. Gronbech-Jensen, R. Giles, and P. Tamayo.
Parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics.
In D. Stauffer, editor, Annual reviews of computational physics III, pages 119-176. World Scientific, 1995.

36

http://pdswww.rwcp.or.jp/, since 1993.

37

J.H. (editor) Kim.
Special issue about the first micro-robot world cup soccer tournament, MIROSOT.
Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 21(2):137-205, 1997.

38

D. Sternad.
personal communication.

39

J.D. Rothwell.
Control of Human Voluntary Movement.
Chapman and Hall, 1994.

40

TRANSIMS.
TRansportation ANalysis and SIMulation System, since 1992.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM. See transims.tsasa.lanl.gov.

41

A. Voellmy, M. Vrtic, B. Raney, K. Axhausen, and K. Nagel.
Status of a TRANSIMS implementation for Switzerland.
Networks and Spatial Economics, forthcoming. See www.inf.ethz.ch/~nagel/papers.

42

D. Charypar.
Genetic algorithms for activity planning.
Term project, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, in progress.
See www.inf.ethz.ch/ nagel/papers.

43

DYNAMIT, since 1999.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. See its.mit.edu. Also see dynamictrafficassignment.org.

44

See www.dynasmart.com. Also see dynamictrafficassignment.org.

45

A. de Palma and F. Marchal.
Real case applications of the fully dynamic METROPOLIS tool-box: an advocacy for large-scale mesoscopic transportation systems.
Networks and Spatial Economics, 2002.

46

K. Nagel and P. Wagner (editors).
Special issue on regional transportation simulations.
Networks and Spatial Economics, forthcoming.
See www.inf.ethz.ch/~nagel/papers.

47

J. Esser and K. Nagel.
Iterative demand generation for transportation simulations.
In D. Hensher and J. King, editors, The Leading Edge of Travel Behavior Research, pages 659-681. Pergamon, 2001.